Static Stretching vs Dynamic Techniques in Modern Baseball Warmup Practices

Introduction

For decades, coaches and athletes believed that holding static stretches before a game would prevent injuries and improve performance. In youth baseball dugouts and professional clubhouses alike, pre-game routines often included static stretches like toe-touches or arm pulls. However, sports science has evolved, and a new paradigm has emerged favoring dynamic warm-ups over prolonged static stretching. This shift is especially relevant for baseball players from Little League to college and beyond. Modern training approaches emphasize active movements, muscle activation, and sport-specific drills to better prepare the body for play. This article explores the evidence on static vs. dynamic stretching, how warm-up practices have changed, and what current best practices recommend for baseball players ages 9–18 (and into college) to maximize performance and minimize injury risk.

History: From Static Stretch Circles to Dynamic Warm-ups

Traditionally, pre-game warm-ups in baseball (and many sports) revolved around static stretching. It was common to see youth teams circle up and hold stretches for major muscle groups, a practice based on the assumption that loosening muscles would prevent pulls or strains. Static stretching – where a muscle is elongated and held for 10–30 seconds – was even taught in physical education classes as a necessary first step before vigorous activity. Coaches viewed it as a prophylactic measure, believing it enhanced flexibility and reduced injuries.

By the late 1990s and early 2000s, scientific evidence began to challenge this long-held routine. Researchers found that while static stretching does increase flexibility, it offered little to no benefit in preventing injuries or boosting athletic performance. In fact, a considerable body of data showed that pre-event static stretches were associated with impairments in strength, power, sprint speed, and jump height, without a clear reduction in injury risk. Static stretching had been “once considered a prophylactic” to improve performance, but studies revealed it could cause “stretch-induced impairments” in muscle force and explosive movements. By the early 2010s, many coaches and trainers took notice of these findings. A “massive push” began to eliminate lengthy static stretching from warm-ups and replace it with dynamic movements. This shift in athletic training paradigms was driven by the need to maximize performance on the field and incorporate evidence-based injury prevention strategies.

Little League Baseball and other youth organizations slowly adapted their guidance as well. While older coaching manuals might have emphasized static stretching after a brief jog, newer recommendations encourage a more active warm-up. For example, dynamic stretching and mobility drills are now promoted as the first phase of pre-game preparation for players of all ages. The historical routine of static stretch circles has largely given way to jogging, high knees, arm circles, and other dynamic exercises that mimic baseball movements. This doesn’t mean static stretching is gone completely – many teams still include a few short static stretches at the end of a warm-up or during cool-down – but the emphasis before gameplay has clearly shifted toward dynamic warm-ups.

Current Evidence: Static Stretching vs. Dynamic Warm-ups

Static Stretching and Performance: A wealth of sports science research has scrutinized static stretching’s acute effects on performance. The consensus is that holding long static stretches right before explosive activity can be counterproductive. Studies show that pre-event static stretching may actually diminish aspects of performance such as strength, power, speed, and reaction time. In one cited example, collegiate sprinters who static-stretched before a 40-meter dash ran about 3% slower than without stretching. In baseball terms, this could translate to a pitcher losing a few miles per hour on a fastball or a baserunner being a step slower. The performance reductions from static stretching are thought to stem from decreased neural activation and reduced musculotendinous stiffness in the stretched muscles. Essentially, a muscle that’s been stretched to relax may become temporarily less able to produce force quickly.

Research specific to baseball players confirms these trends. A 2011 study on collegiate baseball athletes compared a static stretching warm-up to a dynamic warm-up (and to no warm-up) by measuring vertical jump and long jump performance. The dynamic warm-up group jumped significantly higher and farther than the static stretching group. On average, players gained nearly 5 cm (almost 2 inches) on their vertical jump and about 12 cm on a standing long jump by switching from static stretches to dynamic movements. Notably, the static-stretch group in that study even performed slightly worse than the no warm-up control in some measures, suggesting static stretching before activity can impair explosiveness more than doing nothing at all. Such evidence undercuts the old assumption that static stretching “can’t hurt” – in fact, it may hurt performance.

Static stretching’s impact on throwing velocity and baseball-specific skills has also been examined. Some studies (including one on Division III pitchers) found no significant difference in pitching velocity when static stretches were done between innings. However, between-inning stretches differ from pre-game routines; by game time, pitchers are already warm. The prevailing concern remains that static stretching as the first activity in a warm-up is detrimental. The performance drop from static stretching can last for at least several minutes and up to an hour or more into the activity. One sports medicine source notes that static stretching before explosive efforts may limit the body’s ability to react quickly, with negative effects on vertical jump, sprint speed, balance, and reaction time lasting up to two hours. In high-stakes competition where every inch or millisecond counts, even small decrements (1–3%) in performance can decide the outcome of a play. It’s no wonder that strength and conditioning coaches have grown wary of static stretching immediately before games.

Static Stretching and Injury Risk: Does static stretching at least help prevent injuries? Surprisingly, extensive research says no. Multiple reviews have found little scientific evidence that pre-event static stretching prevents sports injuries. The Mayo Clinic’s sports medicine experts bluntly state that “the research over the past couple of decades hasn’t found that static stretching offers much benefit in reducing risk of injury”. The rationale behind static stretching for injury prevention was that looser muscles might be less prone to tears. However, most acute injuries in sports (like muscle strains) are more effectively prevented by increasing blood flow and muscle temperature via warm-up, rather than by temporarily elongating muscles. In fact, overemphasizing static stretching can sometimes be counterproductive – excessive static stretching may create joint laxity and reduce joint stability, which in a high-intensity sport like baseball could **increase** injury risk to joints that rely on stability. One review by McHugh & Cosgrave (2010) noted that too much static stretching before dynamic activity might lead to “looseness” in the joints that is not beneficial when the athlete then has to perform explosive, controlled movements. That said, static stretching itself is not inherently dangerous if done with proper technique; it simply doesn’t provide the protective effect once believed, especially when used alone.

Dynamic Warm-ups and Benefits: Dynamic stretching and warm-up exercises have gained traction as the preferred approach before sports. Dynamic warm-ups involve active movements that take the muscles and joints through full ranges of motion, gradually increasing intensity. Unlike static holds, dynamic exercises (think leg swings, arm circles, lunges, torso rotations, etc.) actively warm the muscles, increase circulation, and “wake up” the nervous system. Research supports that dynamic warm-ups can improve subsequent performance and may offer some injury-prevention benefit by better preparing the body for activity. When done as part of a complete warm-up, dynamic stretching helps improve blood flow, neuromuscular activation, and joint mobility – all of which prime the body for the demands of a game. Athletes who perform dynamic warm-ups often exhibit better speed, agility, and power output compared to when they perform static stretches or no warm-up at all.

Physiologically, dynamic warm-ups raise core body and muscle temperature, making soft tissues more pliable and responsive. This leads to reduced muscle stiffness (in a good way) without the neural inhibition caused by static holds. For example, dynamic movements have been shown to increase heart rate and blood temperature, lubricate joints with synovial fluid, and enhance nerve conduction and muscle elasticity. All these changes contribute to muscles that contract faster and more forcefully. As one performance coach put it, dynamic stretching “gets the joints and connective tissues warmed up” and “wakes up the neuromuscular system,” priming muscle groups for faster contractions. In baseball, where explosive arm and leg actions are crucial (pitching, swinging, sprinting), the advantages of dynamic warm-ups translate to better readiness. A properly executed dynamic routine can also improve coordination and reaction time; for instance, mobility exercises that mirror fielding or pitching movements train the body to respond more quickly on the field.

Importantly, dynamic warm-ups contribute to injury prevention by functioning as a more comprehensive preparation. Gradually ramping up activity increases tendon and muscle flexibility in a functional way and alerts the body’s proprioception and stabilizer muscles. A dynamic baseball warm-up will typically include a progression from low-intensity to higher-intensity movements, which helps avoid sudden stress on cold muscles. Studies suggest that dynamic stretches, especially when they mimic sport-specific motions, allow muscles and joints to “adapt gradually to the stress of throwing,” cutting down the risk of muscle strains and joint injuries. While research on dynamic warm-ups and injury rates is still evolving (and sometimes conflicting), most experts agree that an active warm-up is a critical component of an injury prevention strategy, whereas static stretching alone is insufficient. The evidence is strong enough that numerous fitness and medical organizations – including the American College of Sports Medicine and the National Strength & Conditioning Association – now advise against prolonged static stretching before high-intensity sports, recommending dynamic warm-ups instead.

Best Practices in Modern Baseball Warm-ups

Reflecting the current evidence, modern baseball training at all levels has moved toward dynamic warm-up routines. The guiding principle is to use the warm-up to prepare the athlete for the specific movements and intensity of the game, rather than simply to increase static flexibility. Here we outline accepted pre-game practices as seen in youth leagues, high school/college programs, and professional baseball. While the complexity and duration of warm-ups may increase with the athlete’s age and level of play, the core elements remain consistent: raise the body temperature, activate key muscle groups, improve mobility, and simulate sport motions – all before the first pitch.

Youth Baseball (Little League, ages ~9–12): At the youth level, the focus is on instilling good habits and ensuring kids are physically ready to play. A proper warm-up for young baseball players typically begins with light aerobic exercise such as jogging or skipping to “raise” the heart rate and body temperature. This is often followed by dynamic stretching drills that double as fun activities: for example, high-knees running, side shuffles, carioca (grapevine) steps, arm windmills, leg swings, and torso twists. These movements are age-appropriate and help improve flexibility, range of motion, and muscle coordination in a way that mimics actions they’ll use in the game. Notably, Little League guidelines recommend warming up the muscles first (via easy running or similar) and then doing stretching that includes dynamic movements. By making dynamic warm-ups routine, coaches help young athletes increase blood flow and loosen up safely. After these general drills, a youth warm-up segues into sport-specific prep like a gradual throwing progression and some fielding practice.

High School and College Baseball (ages ~13–22): As athletes mature, warm-ups become more structured and comprehensive, often guided by athletic trainers or strength coaches. Most high school and collegiate programs now employ dynamic warm-up protocols similar to those used by pros. A popular framework is the “RAMP” protocol – Raise, Activate, Mobilize, and Potentiate – which outlines phases of a warm-up. In practice, this might look like: 5–10 minutes of light cardio to raise body temperature, followed by activation exercises targeting key muscle groups (e.g. glute bridges or band exercises for the hips and shoulders), then mobilization through dynamic stretches (leg swings, hip openers, arm reaches), and finally potentiation activities (short sprints, jumps or quick footwork to ramp up to game speed). The dynamic stretching and mobility component is crucial – it addresses any tight areas while keeping the body moving. Research shows that such active warm-ups can “drastically improve functional performance” by enhancing coordination and reaction speed, which is vital even for a fielder reacting to a hard-hit ball.

High school and college teams also integrate sport-specific drills into the warm-up. A common practice is a structured throwing progression for all players: start with easy short throws, then back up gradually to longer distances, incorporating increased intensity as the arm warms up. This kind of progressive throwing warm-up allows the shoulder and arm muscles to warm up gradually and safely, reducing the risk of arm strains. Many programs include resistance band activation as well, especially for pitchers and position players preparing to throw. Elastic band routines (like the popular J-Bands^® exercises) are designed to activate and strengthen the rotator cuff and scapular muscles. Over the last decade, Jaeger bands (J-Bands) and similar tubing have become a staple of baseball warm-ups from youth travel teams to Division I college programs. Typically, players perform a series of band pulls and rotations as a dynamic form of stretching/strengthening – the goal is to pump blood into the shoulder muscles, stimulate the motor units, and lubricate the joints through movement. Coaches liken this to doing dynamic warm-ups for the arm: it wakes up the shoulder complex and prepares it for throwing, much as leg swings prepare the legs for sprinting. Light resistance bands are a convenient way to achieve these warm-up goals, and few would argue against their effectiveness in modern routines. In fact, these band exercises are considered “essential to maintain arm health and injury prevention” as part of pre-throwing arm care for older youth and teen players.

Beyond bands, many high school and college teams have adopted mobility tools and dynamic implements. Some use foam rollers or massage sticks briefly to roll out tight areas before dynamic work (though this is more for comfort and not a substitute for active warm-up). Dynamic mobility routines might include things like inchworms, world’s greatest stretch (lunge with elbow-to-instep), and trunk rotations – all to ensure key joints (hips, spine, shoulders) have good range of motion prior to intense activity. Teams also emphasize activation of the core and glutes (e.g. planks, mini-band lateral walks) as part of the warm-up, recognizing that a fully engaged kinetic chain can help prevent injuries.

Professional and Advanced Baseball (College/Pro, including MLB): At the highest levels of baseball, warm-up routines are meticulously planned and often individualized. Major League Baseball teams typically have a standardized dynamic warm-up that every player goes through before pre-game batting practice and again before the game. These routines, led by strength and conditioning coaches, can last 15–20 minutes and cover full-body movement prep. You’ll see MLB players doing things like dynamic leg stretches, arm circles, hurdle drills, mobility flows, and short agility drills in the outfield as part of their pre-game ritual. Static stretching, if done at all, is minimal and usually targeted (for example, a quick calf stretch or triceps stretch for a few seconds) only after the body is already warm.

An area where advanced programs have innovated is in throwing warm-ups with weighted balls or “plyometric” balls. Some professional development organizations (like Driveline Baseball) incorporate weighted PlyoCare^® balls into the pre-throwing routine. The idea is that throwing a slightly heavier ball at sub-maximal effort can reinforce proper mechanics and further warm up the arm in a controlled way. According to Driveline’s research, using overloaded balls makes the arm move more slowly and deliberately, which actually makes them “great for a warm-up” before ramping up intensity. A typical plyometric throwing warm-up might include a series of drills (e.g. reverse throws, pivot pick-offs, and step-back throws with a weighted ball) before picking up the standard baseball. However, this practice is generally reserved for older, more experienced players (college or pro) under supervision, as improper use of weighted balls can pose its own risks. When done correctly, a weighted ball routine can serve as both an extended dynamic warm-up and a skill-specific prep, addressing mechanical “deficiencies” while getting the arm loose. Many MLB pitchers these days have their own pre-game routines that may include weighted ball tosses, shoulder tube exercises, and other advanced modalities – all on top of the fundamental dynamic warm-up and band work.

Crucially, modern best practices across all levels emphasize that warm-ups should be progressive and sport-specific. After the general dynamic stretching period, baseball players move into throwing, hitting, and fielding drills at moderate intensity, effectively bridging the gap between warm-up and gameplay. For example, youth and high school teams will do a round of light batting practice or soft toss after stretching, and take infield/outfield practice to get their defensive movements warmed up. These activities not only sharpen skills but also continue the warm-up in a functional manner. By the time the first pitch is thrown, players have gradually increased their intensity from a slow jog to full game-speed movements. This comprehensive approach – combining dynamic stretching, aerobic conditioning, throwing progression, and sport drills – is now considered the gold standard for pre-game preparation.

Recommendations for Pre-Game Warm-up Routines

Based on current evidence and the practices of leading sports medicine professionals and baseball coaches, here are key recommendations for designing an effective and safe pre-game warm-up routine for baseball players (especially in the 9–18 age range, as well as college athletes):

• Start with Aerobic Activity (“Raise”): Begin with 5–10 minutes of light cardio to raise body temperature and blood flow. For example, have players jog around the field, do skipping rope, or perform a series of short shuttle runs. This phase helps prevent injury by gradually ramping up circulation and loosening the muscles.
• Incorporate Dynamic Stretching and Mobility: Spend the next 5–10 minutes on dynamic stretches that mimic baseball movements and actively move joints through their range of motion. Focus on major muscle groups used in baseball: legs, hips, core, shoulders. Good dynamic drills include high knees, butt-kicks, carioca shuffles, walking lunges with a twist, leg swings in multiple directions, arm circles, trunk rotations, and inchworms. Dynamic stretching “plays a significant role in pre-game warm-ups” by improving flexibility, range of motion, and muscle coordination without the downsides of static holds. Encourage athletes to perform these movements with control – they should feel muscles working and warming, not overstretching.
• Activate Key Muscle Groups: Include activation exercises, possibly overlapping with dynamic stretches, to “wake up” specific muscles. Common ones are mini-band routines for glutes (lateral band walks), scapular retraction movements for the upper back, and core stabilizations like planks or side planks (briefly). For the shoulder, light resistance band routines (e.g. J-Band exercises) are highly recommended for any player about to throw. These exercises promote blood flow to the shoulder, build functional strength in the rotator cuff, and have become a key to preventing arm injuries as part of warm-up. A typical band circuit might include exercises like external rotations, “pull-aparts,” diagonal raises, and shoulder presses with the band – 8–15 reps each, done with light tension. Remember, the goal here is warm-up and activation, not fatigue: bands should be of low resistance such that the player can complete the routine without muscle failure. By the end of this phase, the athlete should feel warm, loose, and responsive.
• Gradual Throwing Progression: Especially for baseball, an arm-specific warm-up is crucial. After general dynamic work, have players begin throwing at low intensity and short distance. For instance, start with 10–15 feet apart, and make gentle throws focusing on form. Then step back to 30 feet, then 60 feet, incrementally increasing the throwing effort. This gradual progression allows the shoulder and elbow to adapt and significantly reduces the risk of arm strain. Coaches often supervise this, ensuring players don’t immediately try to “air it out” to full distance. Pitchers can do a longer progression, ending with a few pitches off the mound or flat ground as their final potentiation. Position players can incorporate some position-specific throws (catchers to second base throws, infielders quick tosses, outfielders a few long tosses) once fully warm.
• Sport-Specific Drills (“Potentiate”): In the final 5–15 minutes before game time, include drills that simulate game activities at a controlled pace. This might involve taking ground balls, fielding some fly balls, and executing a few swings. For example, a team can do a brief infield/outfield drill where players field hits and make throws, or hitters can do soft toss or tee work. These drills not only keep players loose but also mentally prepare them by rehearsing game-like scenarios. As the Babe Ruth League guidelines note, position-specific warm-ups (grounders for infielders, fly balls for outfielders, throws for catchers) ensure that each player’s body is ready for the exact movements they’ll perform in the game. If time permits, hitters might take a round of batting practice or hit wiffle balls – again, to bridge from warm-up to competition. Just be sure these activities don’t become exhaustive; they should be short and crisp, designed to “potentiate” performance (prime the muscles and nervous system) rather than wear players out.
• Limit Static Stretching to Cool-Down or Specific Needs: Save any prolonged static stretching for after the game or practice (during cool-down) or at least after the dynamic warm-up is completed. Static stretches are effective for improving flexibility over the long term, so they have a place in training – just not right before explosive activity. If an athlete feels particularly tight in an area (e.g., hamstrings or calves), it’s acceptable to do a short 10-second static stretch **after** the dynamic portion and before gameplay, but it should be brief. Long (30+ second) static stretches should be reserved for post-activity when the goal is recovery and flexibility maintenance, not performance. As one orthopedic expert put it, static stretching works well as part of a cool-down to “help prevent injury” by maintaining range of motion, but using static stretching in a warm-up can “actually negatively impact your performance” by temporarily limiting quick reactions. Thus, the recommendation is clear: prioritize dynamic methods in warm-ups and do static flexibility work at other times.
• Consistency and Routine: Whatever warm-up protocol you choose, ensure it becomes a consistent routine for the players. Athletes – especially young ones – benefit from a structured approach that they can perform habitually. Consistent warm-ups build muscle memory for those movements and can have a positive psychological effect, signaling to the athlete that it’s time to compete. Many coaches report that a regular warm-up routine not only physically prepares players but also helps them mentally switch into “game mode” through ritual and focus. This mental preparation aspect (visualizing success, focusing during warm-up drills) is often overlooked but is an added benefit of a thorough pre-game routine. Encourage players to treat warm-ups seriously as the first part of the game, not just a formality.

In summary, an ideal pre-game warm-up for baseball might look something like this (approximately 20–30 minutes total):

• Jogging or light aerobic exercise – 5 minutes
• Dynamic stretching and mobility drills – 5 minutes
• Resistance band activation (shoulders/hips) – 5 minutes
• Throwing progression and arm care – 5–10 minutes
• Batting and fielding drills – 5–10 minutes

This aligns with the sample routines promoted by youth baseball organizations, which allocate a few minutes to each of these components. The exact timing can be adjusted based on the age of players and available warm-up window (younger kids might do a slightly shorter overall warm-up due to shorter attention spans, whereas high school and college teams often go longer and more intensively).

Conclusion

The evolution from static stretching to dynamic warm-ups in baseball reflects a broader trend in sports science: training methods must adapt to evidence about what truly enhances performance and safety. Static stretching is not “bad” – it still improves flexibility and can aid recovery – but doing it right before high-intensity play has proven to be ineffective or even detrimental for explosive sports like baseball. Dynamic warm-ups, on the other hand, have shown clear benefits in getting athletes game-ready: they elevate performance (more power, speed, and agility) and prepare the body in ways that help fend off injuries. From 9-year-old Little Leaguers to college athletes and Major League stars, the consensus among sports medicine experts and coaches is to emphasize movement, activation, and sport-specific prep in the warm-up.

Coaches working with youth players should educate themselves and their teams on these modern best practices. It can be as simple as replacing those old pre-game static stretch lines with engaging dynamic drills and a structured throwing warm-up. The long-term payoff is significant: players who warm up properly will perform better on the field and are less likely to get hurt. For the players themselves, understanding the “why” behind the warm-up can boost their compliance and effort – explain that those leg swings and arm circles are scientifically proven to help them run faster, hit harder, and throw better than static stretching would. Baseball may be a game of tradition, but when it comes to pre-game preparation, embracing the new paradigm of dynamic warm-ups is a smart, evidence-based move that benefits athletes at every level.

Sources and Further Reading

1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10956367/ (Fowles et al., 2000)
2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16095425/ (Yamaguchi & Ishii, 2005)
3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21659901/ (Kay & Blazevich, 2012)
4. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2012.01444.x  (Simic et al., 2013)
5. https://journals.lww.com/cjsportsmed/fulltext/2004/09000/does_stretching_improve_performance___a_systematic.4.aspx (Shrier, 2004)
6. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00421-011-1879-2 (Behm & Chaouachi, 2011)
7. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.01058.x (McHugh & Cosgrave, 2010)
8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15903378/ (Faigenbaum et al., 2005)
9. https://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/Fulltext/2014/01000/Effects_of_static_and_dynamic_stretching_on_sprint.20.aspx (Paradisis et al., 2014)
10. https://journals.lww.com/acsm-csmr/fulltext/2014/05000/the_effects_of_stretching_on_performance.12.aspx (Peck et al., 2014)
11. https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.1139/apnm-2015-0235 (Behm et al., 2016)
12. https://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/Fulltext/2010/02000/Effects_of_acute_static_stretching_of_the_throwing.23.aspx (Haag et al., 2010)
13. https://journals.lww.com/acsm-msse/fulltext/2004/03000/the_impact_of_stretching_on_sports_injury_risk__a.4.aspx (Thacker et al., 2004)
14. https://link.springer.com/article/10.2165/00007256-200434070-00003 (Witvrouw et al., 2004)
15. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18785063/ (Small et al., 2008)
16. https://journals.lww.com/acsm-msse/fulltext/2000/02000/a_randomized_trial_of_preexercise_stretching_for.4.aspx (Pope et al., 2000)
17. https://link.springer.com/article/10.2165/00007256-200737120-00006 (Woods et al., 2007)
18. https://www.bmj.com/content/325/7362/468 (Herbert & Gabriel, 2002)
19. https://www.bmj.com/content/337/bmj.a2469 (Soligard et al., 2008)
20. https://doi.org/10.1519/18205.1  (McMillian et al., 2006)
21. https://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/fulltext/2008/07000/four_week_dynamic_stretching_warm_up_intervention.36.aspx (Herman & Smith, 2008)
22. https://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/fulltext/2010/08000/effect_of_warm_ups_involving_static_or_dynamic.5.aspx (Chaouachi et al., 2010)
23. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10593217/ (Shrier, 1999)
24. https://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/fulltext/2010/01000/effects_of_warming_up_on_physical_performance__a.21.aspx (Fradkin et al., 2010)
25. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00421-020-04538-8 (Behm et al., 2021)
26. https://www.jospt.org/doi/10.2519/jospt.1994.19.1.12 (Smith, 1994)
27. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/036354658801600206 (Safran et al., 1988)
28. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1356689X03000109 (Weldon & Hill, 2003)
29. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004951414603767 (Pope et al., 1998)
30. https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/48/11/871 (Lauersen et al., 2014)